Karuppan Chetty V Suah Thian 1916 Law Teacher
Suah thian 1916 fmslr 300 case was referred.
Karuppan chetty v suah thian 1916 law teacher. In karuppan chetty v. Powered by create your own unique website with customizable templates. However 3 exceptions have been made such as contract for necessaries section 26. Academia edu is a platform for academics to share research papers.
Karuppan chetty v suah thian 1916 1 fmslr 300 perjanjian yang dibuat diistihar batal kerana tidak tentu sebab pihak pihak bersetuju untuk memajak sebanyak 35 sebulan selama mana dia suka. Agreement must be certain as in case of karuppan chetty v suah thian 1916. Parties engaging contract must have legal capacity. This kind of contract is void because the price is uncertain.
For example if bernard is promise to sell his car to david and the price is decide by his father later. 11 every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject and who is of sound mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject. Suah thian the parties agreed upon the granting of a lease at rm 35 00 per month for as long as he like. Suah thian 1916 1 fmslr 300.
Failure of meeting this condition is a void contract and section 30 of the contracts act is providing this karuppan chetty v. Suah tian 1916 1 f m s l r 300 fact of the case. This is meaning to say the term of a contract have to be specific and cannot be vague. The parties agreed upon the granting of a lease at rm 35 per month for as long as he likes.
Capacity refers to the ability of the parties to a contract to fully understand its terms and obligations. Written agreement karuppan chetty v. The court held that the requirement of certainty had not been satisfied as the duration of one of the most. Karuppan chetty v suah thian 1916 where the court held that the requirement of certainty was not met when the parties agreed upon the granting of a lease at rm35.
Perjanjian perlu menyebut dengan jelas tempoh waktu yang dipajak. 00 per month as long as he likes. Every person who is age of majority age of majority act 1971 according to law and sound mind is competent for contract and qualified to be contracted by law section 11contract act. Karuppan chetty v suah thian.